Discussion about the Play “A Raisin in the Sun” Essay

If the ideates surrounded by the great unwashed clashed in a authority that their desires atomic number 18 going towards unlike unpar anyel directions, de get going it be a portentous factor that discharge suggest that the day intake volition no extensiveer be achieved? Or will it remain to be a matter of what to do and mutualist with the ability to adapt with each(prenominal) the situations To crap a new one or to stay as a dupe of the failure that happened? Moreover, it do-nothing be the mental test of whether the dream will be created by a per intelligence or the situations deal failures will create the dreamers.Either charge, it is up to the dreamer which one he will allow to happen. The play A Raisin in the Sun pictured a family bounciness with dreams, subjected for possibility and risks of failures and tended to stand up one time again to bound themselves again with dissimilar dreams and start all over. Situations had become to a fault oppressive that they show themselves sometimes, in the midst of dilemmas that ar more likely to be considered as lack of options. Each members of the family has oppress wish that distinguished their character from an some other.In a way, this is the typical Ameri stool family with their frugal and social mental synthesis and reacting normally with the function of the other bounteous factor that make the twist of the report card the factor of Money. With the shine of the story, the struggles the family had in dealing with their situations afterward the last of the father caused them to create the ideal situations in their head of what needs to be through with(p). in that respect remained their intentions to devour reform existent for their family and better life for themselves individually.This later tested their circumnavigate with their family ties. With the individual suppositionion of what is good, what groundwork scarcely go wrong is the inability to be in bond of what you demanded with what other family members wanted. It ass also become a consequent spare-time activityion of whether you hold betting to your dreams or hold on to the big picture of what needs to be done as part of the family (Mintz and Kellogg 38). The characters of the play supplied the dreamers federal agency and collectively, a set of line of descenting eccentrics carrying ideas and subjects. tick in mid 1800s, the story was have-to doe with in the dreams of the Younger Family and clashes with prejudices that the characters had as they stress to have a better home in their community as a whole. Perspective to be used in the Analysis thither are schools of thoughts that are highly applicable with the study of the family be portrayed in this play indite by Lorraine Hansberry first gear, we domiciliate see it in the office using functionalism or second, it can be through interactionism. Later, this will be used to reveal how the dreams are existence formed and what th e motivatings that determined the creation of these dreams are.These are the schools that traced the families in America with their way of universe developed, managed and designed. The material variable in the family structure can be seen through the business office they are playing and be study objectively. Also, we can also see it from the perspective of an interactionist who is primarily concerned with the way the people are acting in chemical reaction to other people or situations. Yes, these schools have difference with the primary objects of their concern, but essentially they contribute with the thorough instinct with the functions and interactions saying of a family (Hamilton 47).It can give us the ideas of where the dreams of the characters in the story are truly say. The Dreamers, their Motivations, and the Clash It all started with Ten gigabyte Dollars. The characters of the play provided the audiences with the humanistic range of affirmable thought mathemati cal operation that can be derived from a single source of remark. There was an emphasis given earlier with the use of goods and services of Money in this story for this is the stimulus that moved the characters to make their stand. The capital pertains to the $10,000 insurance policy amount of capital that Lena Younger, the maternal character non just a mother record, got after her preserve passed away.Lena is also called mammy in the story and she possessed the maternal qualities that represent a picture of a loving, caring, and understanding woman. Such a woman besides has one goal in life To make her babyren happy or happier with all of her ability. The material figure that conveyed this goal of Mama is the mark that she bought for $3,000. It symbolizes the unity, stability, and economical status that she believes to be important for her family (Morrin and Hansberry 35-38). The picture of the dramatics portrayed the whole dream of Lena. It extends from the social flat coat of its manifestation to the subtle emotion a mother could possibly feel.This dream clashes with her sons concerns. Walter, the son, has concerns roughly the Money that can be categorized as the dream for continuous economic stability of the family. When it comes with the re throw upation of his character, he can be the figure that represents masculine authority of the story. He supplied the relay transmitter role but with his racial prejudices diametrical with his negates while performing both role of a son and a husband makes him supply his own contrast as an antagonist. Walter became not excited about the house bought by Mama. He has ulterior motives for the money and had a clear image in his mind on what to do with the money.For quite an a long time, he has a dream of participating in a business involved in strong drink products (Morrin and Hansberry 47). As a masculine role, the story puts more authority in Walters hand as he got the contain over the Insurance money and managed it. Lena put his trust on Walter and this shows how Lena is more than involuntary to give whatever her child wants. though this doesnt show any match of negligence in her part. The acquisition process of the dream in this context doesnt have any encroach yet. The conflict happened with the aftermath of the decision that placed Walter in the position of higher authority with the Money.The first clash of dream is done with the devil given characters and the structure of both dreams moldiness be observed carefully. We can get a line the function of money ranges from how it fueled the quest for the dream to the conflict the two characters had. The conflict didnt last since one of these two dreams was re structure. Lena, whose dream is to provide what her children wanted close up managed to achieve it in a way by fueling Walters use of achieving his dream. There was a conflict because the functions of the house Lena bought dont go with the alignment of Walters d ream.It was settled because Lena followed that alignment as a response without violating her desires that is basically structured solely for the happiness of her children. The other child of Lena is Beneatha, the twenty year old woman, who had dream of being a physician. She is considered as smart and also an ambitious college student and inevitable Money for the matriculation of the course. The conflicts Beneatha had are connect to the money she required for her education and this is directed to Walter who has the control over it.Her sole dream of becoming a doctor will be compromised without the money. She got mad at Walter when she well-read that Walter did not put any amount for her study. It seems like a big turnround from all of her aspirations and she went depressed. This clash is apparently rough for Beneatha since, if money is the fuel for her actions in make her dreams realized, then it is a big contrast to have none of it. Her dream virtually vanished. How did she turn out to continue seeing hoe despite of what happened? There is other character named Asagai who became the voice of realization.He do Beneatha realized the key thing about this vision of the dream she formed in her head. The dream had already been in her thoughts nonetheless prior to the death of his father, so it gist that equating money to her dream is a big nuisance. It would be similar to the grievous equation of his fathers death hand in hand with the money. This showed that in that respect remained to be ways on how it could be fulfilled without that so-called fuel of money. It can be money coming from different source instead. Beneatha realized this important thing, found her hope, continued dreaming.With the structure of their dreams, it is apparent that money equates house, then money equates liquor inject and finally, money equated matriculation. With its many form, money remained to be the prime motivation that was shown in the play. The big question would be, along this clash of dreams, for how long can money control or determine the actions of the characters? On the mid part of the play, Walter was betrayed by his business partner go away him with no money. There came the confrontations with Walter and the other characters oddly with his wife, Ruth, who was also driven by dreams of having fiscal stability.It made them start from the scratch and all realizations that they need were established. Money is just a motivation but never a determinant of the timberland of life that a harmonious family could have. Moreover, the dreams are manifestations that we are living while seeking whatever we want out of life. Money is not lots important although, yes, it rates reasonably as oxygen. Lorraine Hansberrys approach in tackling the concept of American dream showed that Money can either be seen as a fuel or an obstacle. The dreams that we have though is a picture of what we can do.At the same time as what we can see in the play is the motivat ion that money can give us but it doesnt match the quality of motivation that important people can give. Works Cited Hamilton, Peter. Reconsidering Blummers Corrective Against the repletion of Functionalism. Talcott Parsons critical assessments. 4 (1992), 47-49 Mintz, Steven and Kellogg, Susan. Domestic revolutions a social history of American family life. advanced York The Free Press, 1988 Morrin, Maxine and Hansberry, Lorraine. A raisin in the sun. ground forces Research and Education Association, 1994.