Tuesday, February 5, 2019
Essay --
When we analyze a work, it is easy to judge the characters by the standards of our time, but this is not very fair to them. They do not mention our rules they follow the standards of their societies. In addition, unless the characters thoughts are revealed to us in soliloquies or asides, we cannot distinguish if the person knows of his or her actions consequences. To determine if a character is entire or bad, we moldiness set a standard and evaluate it for each text we examine. We shall define goodness as performing actions whose outcomes are net positive, think or not, and badness as the opposite. Through this lens we shall examine office Claudius of Hamlet, discovering that while Claudius might be a good King, he is by all odds not a good person.When we first meet Claudius, he is retention court and giving a very long and eloquent voice communication with frequent use of the royal we. He begins by unifying himself with the sense of hearing in grief over our dear brothers remnant (1.2.1) and then explains he pass on marry Queen Gertrude to both solidify his rule and bring mirth to funeral (1.2.12). However, it is odd that King Hamlets son, Hamlet, did not inherit the throne. Claudius explains, referring to his near marriage, that the nobles have freely gone / With this closeness along (1.2.15-6), so it is likely that he convinced the nobles to vote for him as King instead of Hamlet, who was away. Instead of taking the crown by force, which Laertes and Fortinbras will later attempt, Claudius became King without any harm whatsoever, excepting the murder of King Hamlet. His simmpleness with the royal court and the trust he places in the nobles are signs of his good Kingship, however much hidden blood there may be.Claudius is not just friendly with the nobles. ... ...m the poisoned goblet makes Hamlet realize Claudiuss computer program and results in Hamlet killing him with the same goblet.Although we quickly see through Claudiuss sham, his bad qua lities might be the reason for his good Kingship. after all, a King who is ambitious, manipulative, and selfish would want to keep the throne, and since Claudius dislikes confrontation, he has ostensibly decided to remain in power by being a just and wise ruler. He might have had the wrong motivations and a terrible character, but royal policies were, on the whole, good for Denmark. But we must not forget his terrible choice instead of giving up his sins rewards, he chooses to keep them and kill Hamlet to assure his crown. Make no mistake, Claudius was a bad person, but Denmark had experienced an extraordinary King, ended with poisoned assimilate in his throat and poisoned sword in his chest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment